Trademark Prosecution – Pre-action Mediation of Administrative Appeals

East IP

In August 2021, the Beijing IP Court (BIPC) issued a Notice (available 更多信息参见此处) that provides for potential pre-action mediation of administrative appeal cases involving application appeals. Depending on how it is implemented, it may well help to reduce costs and the time required for such cases.

Such mediations take place between the applicant and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Division and ideally will provide a means of suspending review of the mediated cases until co-pending disputes or appeals are finally decided.

Regrettably, it appears the BIPC still requires that non-Chinese applicants present a legalized POA package before it will consider proposing mediation.

The BIPC gave the following examples of conditions under which BIPC may allow mediations:

  1. The case turns only on the status of the cited mark and the parties acknowledge the determination of the status; and
  2. The determination of the facts in a case is not sufficiently comprehensive, causing a party to file a lawsuit. Once the facts can be determined, the case can be swiftly resolved.

In practice, typical cases that generally meet these conditions include cases where:

  1. The cited mark has been cancelled for non-use, invalidation or opposition or is pending cancellation; and
  2. The cited mark and the applied-for mark effectively belong to the same proprietor (and an assignment is presumably in progress).Media reports indicate that the BIPC will issue implementing rules in due course to further clarify the types of cases that it views as eligible for notices to mediate.  The BIPC has reportedly issued around 300 such notices thus far.

搜索

Most Read

Related Insights

近日,北京市高级人民法院就北京市东权律师事务所代理的易富公司和澳大利亚南社公司(以下合称“原告”)诉上海奔富公司、东方明日公司、曾氏文化公司、曾某、熊某等(以下合称“被告”)就涉及“奔富”品牌的商标侵权及不正当竞争纠纷案件作出终审判决,维持了一审判决。生效判决认定被告的行为构成商标侵权及不正当竞争,适用二倍惩罚性赔偿,判决被告上海奔富公司、东方明日公司和曾氏文化公司赔偿原告经济损失七千余万元,曾某和熊某应在4997万元范围内承担补充赔偿责任。 本案是继2022年最高人民法院在行政案件中以“奔富酒园”商标注册构成“以其他不正当手段取得注册”情形而无效该商标后,中国法院在民事案件中进一步对使用“奔富酒园”等商标的侵权行为进行的有力打击。...
On 17 December 2025, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government launched a comprehensive three-month public consultation on a sweeping review of its...
The 2025 Draft Amendment proposes modest changes to the current law, with most being beneficial to trademark owners. The most notable in this regard...