East IP Represents Tencent in Copyright Action Involving AI-Generated Videos

East IP

In 2024, Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., represented by East IP, filed a civil action together with other plaintiffs against Beijing Baidu Netcom Technology Co., Ltd. for copyright infringement and unfair competition involving the unauthorized use of AI-generated videos.  The Changsha Intermediate People’s Court issued a final decision in this case in December 2024, upholding a decision in the plaintiffs’ favor by the Kaifeng District People’s Court in Changsha.

In this case, the defendant offered users access to “Duijia” software advertised as providing an “AI One Click Film Production” service that created three to seven second videos based upon user requests based upon text.  The plaintiffs complained that their video “Celebrating More Years” which enjoys copyright was copied and stored by the defendant on its server with the intention of allowing its reproduction in video clips created by users that were then published on the defendant’s online Baijiahao video sharing platform.

In its appeal decision, the Changsha Intermediate People’s Court held that the storage of short videos by the defendant in its digital library is protected under the right of online dissemination of copyright works. Court further confirmed the lower court’s view that the defendant had engaged in direct infringement.  

The lower court, in its decision, observed that this was the first case in China confirming copyright protection for AI-generated videos created based upon texts inputs.

The case was managed by East IP litigators 蒋强, Zhang Tianhao, Zhu Nandi, and others.

Related News

近日,East IP受爱奇艺委托,依据《统一域名争议解决政策》(UDRP),就争议域名nadou.org向世界知识产权组织(WIPO)提起投诉。专家组经审理后作出有利裁决,裁定将该域名转移至爱奇艺名下。本案的成功不仅清理了仿冒域名,切实维护了爱奇艺的合法权益,还为中文品牌在跨国域名争议中如何有效举证与维权,提供了具有探索意义的实务参考。...
异议人为全球知名的即时通信企业,其核心商标及字号在第9类(软件)、第38类(通信服务)、第42类(技术服务)等关键类别上已在中国获准注册。被异议人为一家工程顾问公司,在第20、22、37类商品及服务上申请注册了与异议人核心商标、字号完全相同的被异议商标。经调查发现,被异议人的法定代表人兼唯一股东,同时系涉案商标代理机构的投资人及在国家知识产权局备案的商标从业人员;且被异议人网站展示了异议人商标及软件产品,并自称提供与异议人软件相关的服务。据此异议人主张,被异议商标系代理机构借助关联公司名义提出申请,意在规避法律规制。被异议人的行为应被视为代理机构自身的行为。最终,国家知识产权局依据《商标法》第十九条第四款,驳回了该商标的注册申请。...
中华人民共和国第十四届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第二十三次会议于2026年6月26日表决通过新修订的《中华人民共和国商标法》(以下简称“2026年《商标法》”或“新《商标法》”)。新《商标法》将于2027年1月1日起施行。...